<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 402 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114531</link>
    <description>Ethyl Chloride IP-100 ml and Anaesthetic Ether IP-500 ml were held classifiable as bulk drugs under Chapter 29, not as medicaments under Chapter 30, because classification followed the true nature of the goods, the licensing description and technical opinion from drug authorities; small retail packing did not alter that character. On that basis, the assessee was also entitled to Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used in manufacture, as the goods were correctly treated as excisable under Chapter 29 and cleared on payment of duty. The appellate order was annulled, the adjudicating authority&#039;s view restored, and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 402 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114531</link>
      <description>Ethyl Chloride IP-100 ml and Anaesthetic Ether IP-500 ml were held classifiable as bulk drugs under Chapter 29, not as medicaments under Chapter 30, because classification followed the true nature of the goods, the licensing description and technical opinion from drug authorities; small retail packing did not alter that character. On that basis, the assessee was also entitled to Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs used in manufacture, as the goods were correctly treated as excisable under Chapter 29 and cleared on payment of duty. The appellate order was annulled, the adjudicating authority&#039;s view restored, and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>