<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 400 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114529</link>
    <description>A classification dispute over fixed dose combination medicaments containing Vitamins B1, B6 and B12 arose on whether the goods fell under Chapter 30 as medicaments or under Heading 29.36. Conflicting Tribunal views were noted: one line treated the products as medicaments, while another denied Chapter 30 classification absent therapeutic justification and therapeutic value. Because coordinate Benches had taken divergent positions on the same classification question, the matter was directed for placement before the President for constitution of a Larger Bench to obtain authoritative resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:49:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 400 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114529</link>
      <description>A classification dispute over fixed dose combination medicaments containing Vitamins B1, B6 and B12 arose on whether the goods fell under Chapter 30 as medicaments or under Heading 29.36. Conflicting Tribunal views were noted: one line treated the products as medicaments, while another denied Chapter 30 classification absent therapeutic justification and therapeutic value. Because coordinate Benches had taken divergent positions on the same classification question, the matter was directed for placement before the President for constitution of a Larger Bench to obtain authoritative resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>