<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114523</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for missing petrol engines in the RG-I stock. The tribunal held that the incomplete engines found during verification should not automatically lead to duty demand, as the physical presence of the engines was established. It was emphasized that incomplete goods mistakenly entered in the RG-I register should not result in duty liability. Therefore, the demand of duty and penalty were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:34:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114523</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for missing petrol engines in the RG-I stock. The tribunal held that the incomplete engines found during verification should not automatically lead to duty demand, as the physical presence of the engines was established. It was emphasized that incomplete goods mistakenly entered in the RG-I register should not result in duty liability. Therefore, the demand of duty and penalty were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>