https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114493 The Tribunal upheld the demand for custom supervision charges against the appellant holding a private bonded warehouse license with manufacturing-in-bond facilities, emphasizing compliance with license conditions. The appellant's argument that they should not pay as they had only exported a sample consignment was rejected, with the Tribunal highlighting the continuous supervision requirement due to the manufacturing-in-bond provision. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to license terms and obligations, particularly regarding payment of supervision charges as per regulations, and reaffirms that license holders must fulfill their obligations as agreed upon to avoid disputes and liabilities. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 May 2012 11:28:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114493 The Tribunal upheld the demand for custom supervision charges against the appellant holding a private bonded warehouse license with manufacturing-in-bond facilities, emphasizing compliance with license conditions. The appellant's argument that they should not pay as they had only exported a sample consignment was rejected, with the Tribunal highlighting the continuous supervision requirement due to the manufacturing-in-bond provision. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to license terms and obligations, particularly regarding payment of supervision charges as per regulations, and reaffirms that license holders must fulfill their obligations as agreed upon to avoid disputes and liabilities. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114493