<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 579 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants in a case concerning the clearance of Waste Scrap of Copper exceeding the permissible limit set by the Competent Authority. The dispute arose from the interpretation of wastage norms, with the Revenue contending that the appellants exceeded the allowed wastage, leading to duty demand. However, the Tribunal accepted the argument that the solder content should be excluded from the calculation, bringing the wastage levels within the permissible limit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and emphasized the importance of correctly interpreting the wastage norms to determine duty liability accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 579 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants in a case concerning the clearance of Waste Scrap of Copper exceeding the permissible limit set by the Competent Authority. The dispute arose from the interpretation of wastage norms, with the Revenue contending that the appellants exceeded the allowed wastage, leading to duty demand. However, the Tribunal accepted the argument that the solder content should be excluded from the calculation, bringing the wastage levels within the permissible limit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal and emphasized the importance of correctly interpreting the wastage norms to determine duty liability accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>