https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114468 The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision, rejecting the appellant company's claim of waste and scrap as the reason for shortages. The extended period for demand of duty was upheld due to the suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the Order-in-Appeal confirming the duty demand of Rs. 81,788.40 was upheld. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2012 18:31:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114468 The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner's decision, rejecting the appellant company's claim of waste and scrap as the reason for shortages. The extended period for demand of duty was upheld due to the suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the Order-in-Appeal confirming the duty demand of Rs. 81,788.40 was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114468