<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 571 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the customs authorities&#039; decision to confiscate the goods, impose penalties, and demand a higher duty amount due to mis-declaration and suppression of facts for customs duty evasion. The appellant&#039;s reliance on import documents with questionable credibility was dismissed, and the Tribunal found the assessment based on auctioneer&#039;s listing catalogues and invoices from Dubai to be valid. The penalties and confiscation were upheld as reasonable considering the deliberate nature of the offense and the significant duty evasion involved. The original order was confirmed in full, and the appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:22:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 571 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the customs authorities&#039; decision to confiscate the goods, impose penalties, and demand a higher duty amount due to mis-declaration and suppression of facts for customs duty evasion. The appellant&#039;s reliance on import documents with questionable credibility was dismissed, and the Tribunal found the assessment based on auctioneer&#039;s listing catalogues and invoices from Dubai to be valid. The penalties and confiscation were upheld as reasonable considering the deliberate nature of the offense and the significant duty evasion involved. The original order was confirmed in full, and the appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>