<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 570 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114465</link>
    <description>Explosives used in mines for extracting zinc ores were held not to qualify for the benefit of the exemption notifications, because the relevant manufacturing process for zinc concentrate was treated as beginning in the factory and not in the mines. On that basis, the claimed exemption was found inapplicable to the explosives consumed in mining operations, and the rejection of the refund claim was upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 570 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114465</link>
      <description>Explosives used in mines for extracting zinc ores were held not to qualify for the benefit of the exemption notifications, because the relevant manufacturing process for zinc concentrate was treated as beginning in the factory and not in the mines. On that basis, the claimed exemption was found inapplicable to the explosives consumed in mining operations, and the rejection of the refund claim was upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>