<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 567 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114462</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from private notebook entries or general statements unless supported by reliable corroborative evidence; the duty demand on alleged past clearances was therefore set aside. Where yarn was seized during transport and the gate pass was prepared belatedly, the procedural lapse did not by itself determine liability, so the demand was remanded for verification of prior duty payment. A claimed shortage of 85 bags, when explained as a technical discrepancy and not indicative of removal without documents, did not justify duty demand or redemption fine; both were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:07:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 567 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114462</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal cannot be established merely from private notebook entries or general statements unless supported by reliable corroborative evidence; the duty demand on alleged past clearances was therefore set aside. Where yarn was seized during transport and the gate pass was prepared belatedly, the procedural lapse did not by itself determine liability, so the demand was remanded for verification of prior duty payment. A claimed shortage of 85 bags, when explained as a technical discrepancy and not indicative of removal without documents, did not justify duty demand or redemption fine; both were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>