https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114428 The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods due to the appellant's initial declared value not being accepted, despite subsequent enhancement. However, the confiscation of goods was set aside as examination reports contradicted the claim that the goods were over 10 years old. The Tribunal found the goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration, imposing a reduced redemption fine and penalty. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2012 16:07:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114428 The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods due to the appellant's initial declared value not being accepted, despite subsequent enhancement. However, the confiscation of goods was set aside as examination reports contradicted the claim that the goods were over 10 years old. The Tribunal found the goods liable for confiscation due to misdeclaration, imposing a reduced redemption fine and penalty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114428