<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 489 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114420</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unwarranted where the duty had been paid in full, the assessee had followed the special procedure under Rule 173GG after intimating the Central Excise authorities, and no timely communication was given denying that benefit. In the absence of any duty evasion or demonstrated default, the penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 489 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114420</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unwarranted where the duty had been paid in full, the assessee had followed the special procedure under Rule 173GG after intimating the Central Excise authorities, and no timely communication was given denying that benefit. In the absence of any duty evasion or demonstrated default, the penalty was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>