<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 486 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114417</link>
    <description>Duty-free clearance to a 100% export-oriented unit remained valid where the supplier removed a diesel generating set against a duly issued CT-3 certificate and the re-warehousing certificate was endorsed by the competent excise officer. The omission, if any, by the buyer-unit to obtain Board of Approvals approval under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. was treated as the buyer&#039;s issue and did not defeat the supplier&#039;s exemption when the prescribed procedural requirements had been complied with. On that basis, the duty demand against the supplier was held not sustainable and was set aside, with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 486 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114417</link>
      <description>Duty-free clearance to a 100% export-oriented unit remained valid where the supplier removed a diesel generating set against a duly issued CT-3 certificate and the re-warehousing certificate was endorsed by the competent excise officer. The omission, if any, by the buyer-unit to obtain Board of Approvals approval under Notification No. 1/95-C.E. was treated as the buyer&#039;s issue and did not defeat the supplier&#039;s exemption when the prescribed procedural requirements had been complied with. On that basis, the duty demand against the supplier was held not sustainable and was set aside, with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>