<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 483 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; Misc. Application seeking implementation of a High Court Order, emphasizing prevention of abuse of the Tribunal&#039;s process. Despite the request for remand, the Tribunal held that the application was time-barred and reiterated that no further similar applications would be entertained. The Tribunal exercised power under Rule 41 to deter misuse of the Tribunal&#039;s process, warning against repetitive applications without legal basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 483 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; Misc. Application seeking implementation of a High Court Order, emphasizing prevention of abuse of the Tribunal&#039;s process. Despite the request for remand, the Tribunal held that the application was time-barred and reiterated that no further similar applications would be entertained. The Tribunal exercised power under Rule 41 to deter misuse of the Tribunal&#039;s process, warning against repetitive applications without legal basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>