<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming duty and penalties against the company appellant for wrongly availing Modvat credit without cash duty payment, indicating lack of bona fide intention. Despite the company&#039;s corrective actions, penalties were reduced but upheld against all appellants, emphasizing adherence to duty payment conditions for claiming credits and penalizing wrongful credit availing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 473 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order confirming duty and penalties against the company appellant for wrongly availing Modvat credit without cash duty payment, indicating lack of bona fide intention. Despite the company&#039;s corrective actions, penalties were reduced but upheld against all appellants, emphasizing adherence to duty payment conditions for claiming credits and penalizing wrongful credit availing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>