<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114402</link>
    <description>Supplementary invoices issued after finalisation of assessment or on account of cost escalation were treated as valid duty paying documents for Cenvat credit after the amendment to Rule 57AE. The amendment removed the Revenue&#039;s basis for objecting to credit taken on the strength of such invoices, so the credit was rightly allowed and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114402</link>
      <description>Supplementary invoices issued after finalisation of assessment or on account of cost escalation were treated as valid duty paying documents for Cenvat credit after the amendment to Rule 57AE. The amendment removed the Revenue&#039;s basis for objecting to credit taken on the strength of such invoices, so the credit was rightly allowed and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>