https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114395 Modvat credit on furnace oil used for both dutiable manufacture and job-work clearances could not be denied under Rule 57C because goods cleared under Notification No. 217/86 were treated as not exempted goods for that purpose, so the credit was admissible. The demand also lacked sustainability because the show cause notice did not disclose the basis on which the credit reversal had been computed, defeating a proper challenge to the demand. The Revenue's appeal therefore failed. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2012 13:00:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114395 Modvat credit on furnace oil used for both dutiable manufacture and job-work clearances could not be denied under Rule 57C because goods cleared under Notification No. 217/86 were treated as not exempted goods for that purpose, so the credit was admissible. The demand also lacked sustainability because the show cause notice did not disclose the basis on which the credit reversal had been computed, defeating a proper challenge to the demand. The Revenue's appeal therefore failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114395