<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 542 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114376</link>
    <description>Imported goods described as Rovimix E-50 SD, Rovimix H-2 and Rovimix E-50 HD were treated as animal feed supplements because they were found to be specifically used for animal feeding. On that basis, classification under Customs Tariff Heading 29.36 as mixtures or admixtures of vitamins was held to be incorrect. The Tribunal accepted the Revenue&#039;s classification under Customs Tariff Heading 23.09 and set aside the contrary view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:32:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 542 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114376</link>
      <description>Imported goods described as Rovimix E-50 SD, Rovimix H-2 and Rovimix E-50 HD were treated as animal feed supplements because they were found to be specifically used for animal feeding. On that basis, classification under Customs Tariff Heading 29.36 as mixtures or admixtures of vitamins was held to be incorrect. The Tribunal accepted the Revenue&#039;s classification under Customs Tariff Heading 23.09 and set aside the contrary view taken by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>