<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 552 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114355</link>
    <description>The appellants appealed against the denial of their claim for Modvat credit due to lack of endorsement on duty paying documents. The adjudicating authority rejected the claim, citing inconsistencies in duty payment timing. The judge found that the appellants received duty-paid goods and used them in manufacturing without misuse, upholding their right to Modvat credit. The appeal was allowed, and lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 552 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114355</link>
      <description>The appellants appealed against the denial of their claim for Modvat credit due to lack of endorsement on duty paying documents. The adjudicating authority rejected the claim, citing inconsistencies in duty payment timing. The judge found that the appellants received duty-paid goods and used them in manufacturing without misuse, upholding their right to Modvat credit. The appeal was allowed, and lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>