<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 543 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114346</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to deny Modvat credit to the appellants due to insufficient evidence proving the transfer of goods from M/s. Raydak Projects Ltd. to the appellants. The lack of documentation and oral statements led to the rejection of the claim, with authorities finding no legal flaw in the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 543 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114346</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to deny Modvat credit to the appellants due to insufficient evidence proving the transfer of goods from M/s. Raydak Projects Ltd. to the appellants. The lack of documentation and oral statements led to the rejection of the claim, with authorities finding no legal flaw in the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>