<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114343</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi, which had enhanced the declared value of imported acrylic sheets from US $450 PMT to US $700 PMT. The Tribunal found the enhancement unsupported by evidence and overturned the decision, ruling in favor of the Appellants based on the lack of a valid basis for the value increase and the absence of concrete proof to justify the customs authorities&#039; action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 540 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114343</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi, which had enhanced the declared value of imported acrylic sheets from US $450 PMT to US $700 PMT. The Tribunal found the enhancement unsupported by evidence and overturned the decision, ruling in favor of the Appellants based on the lack of a valid basis for the value increase and the absence of concrete proof to justify the customs authorities&#039; action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>