<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114338</link>
    <description>A request to transfer an appeal from the Chennai Bench to the Bangalore Bench was rejected because no valid ground was shown. Alleged inconvenience in pursuing the matter at Chennai was not accepted, as the appeal had been pending for years, the Bangalore Bench had already been functioning for more than three years, and the transfer request was made late on flimsy grounds. The application was found to be devoid of bona fides, so transfer was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 535 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114338</link>
      <description>A request to transfer an appeal from the Chennai Bench to the Bangalore Bench was rejected because no valid ground was shown. Alleged inconvenience in pursuing the matter at Chennai was not accepted, as the appeal had been pending for years, the Bangalore Bench had already been functioning for more than three years, and the transfer request was made late on flimsy grounds. The application was found to be devoid of bona fides, so transfer was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>