<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 643 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114294</link>
    <description>Modvat credit taken more than six months after the relevant customs clearance date was held to be time-barred, because the period had to be reckoned from the order permitting clearance under Section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, i.e. the out-of-charge date. On that basis, credit claimed beyond the prescribed period was not admissible, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 643 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114294</link>
      <description>Modvat credit taken more than six months after the relevant customs clearance date was held to be time-barred, because the period had to be reckoned from the order permitting clearance under Section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, i.e. the out-of-charge date. On that basis, credit claimed beyond the prescribed period was not admissible, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>