<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 620 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114240</link>
    <description>Marginal short receipt of inputs did not justify reversal of Modvat credit where the Revenue did not controvert the factual finding of only a minor deficiency. The record also did not establish any error in the supplier&#039;s weighment or dip measurement, and there was no basis to exclude natural causes as an explanation for the shortage. On that footing, the demand for reversal of credit and the connected penalties were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 620 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114240</link>
      <description>Marginal short receipt of inputs did not justify reversal of Modvat credit where the Revenue did not controvert the factual finding of only a minor deficiency. The record also did not establish any error in the supplier&#039;s weighment or dip measurement, and there was no basis to exclude natural causes as an explanation for the shortage. On that footing, the demand for reversal of credit and the connected penalties were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>