https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114217 Pending abatement claims before the jurisdictional Commissioner justified interim protection against recovery, because the Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to decide those claims and any order passed by him on that issue was non est. As the abatement claims remained unresolved, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in respect of the duty demand, and the matter was directed to regular hearing. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 May 2012 12:56:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114217 Pending abatement claims before the jurisdictional Commissioner justified interim protection against recovery, because the Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to decide those claims and any order passed by him on that issue was non est. As the abatement claims remained unresolved, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in respect of the duty demand, and the matter was directed to regular hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114217