https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114213 The Tribunal upheld the authority's determination of the furnace capacity at 3.59 M.T. based on alteration from 4 M.T., rejecting the appellant's argument that it assessed actual production. The Tribunal found the verification process justified, as no certified capacity was provided due to alteration. The determination of annual production capacity based on altered furnace capacity was deemed in line with regulations, not assessing actual production. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of capacity assessment under the Compounded Levy Scheme. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 May 2012 12:42:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114213 The Tribunal upheld the authority's determination of the furnace capacity at 3.59 M.T. based on alteration from 4 M.T., rejecting the appellant's argument that it assessed actual production. The Tribunal found the verification process justified, as no certified capacity was provided due to alteration. The determination of annual production capacity based on altered furnace capacity was deemed in line with regulations, not assessing actual production. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of capacity assessment under the Compounded Levy Scheme. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114213