<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 598 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of imported goods as software eligible for benefits under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. The imposition of differential duty and penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act was deemed unjustified as the appellants provided substantial technical evidence supporting their classification. The confiscation of goods and redemption fine were set aside as the Tribunal found the confiscation order unsustainable, citing the importance of considering expert opinions. The appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants based on the findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 598 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of imported goods as software eligible for benefits under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. The imposition of differential duty and penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act was deemed unjustified as the appellants provided substantial technical evidence supporting their classification. The confiscation of goods and redemption fine were set aside as the Tribunal found the confiscation order unsustainable, citing the importance of considering expert opinions. The appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants based on the findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>