<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114210</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that denied capital goods credit under Rule 57Q for an Environmental Test Chamber and Housing Plunger. The Tribunal emphasized the user&#039;s assessment is crucial in determining eligibility under the rule and cited past precedents where similar equipment was considered eligible. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal being granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 695 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114210</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order that denied capital goods credit under Rule 57Q for an Environmental Test Chamber and Housing Plunger. The Tribunal emphasized the user&#039;s assessment is crucial in determining eligibility under the rule and cited past precedents where similar equipment was considered eligible. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal being granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>