<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 689 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114203</link>
    <description>Annual capacity under the Hot Re-Rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 had to be fixed on the basis of the assessee&#039;s declared parameters as verified by the Commissioner, including the &#039;d&#039; factor. The &#039;d&#039; factor is the nominal centre distance of the pinions and required verification through actual inspection by Central Excise officers; it was not to be taken mechanically from the sale deed description. Because the verified declaration had already been accepted for fixation of annual capacity, a differential duty demand and consequential penalty based solely on the sale deed figure was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 11:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 689 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114203</link>
      <description>Annual capacity under the Hot Re-Rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 had to be fixed on the basis of the assessee&#039;s declared parameters as verified by the Commissioner, including the &#039;d&#039; factor. The &#039;d&#039; factor is the nominal centre distance of the pinions and required verification through actual inspection by Central Excise officers; it was not to be taken mechanically from the sale deed description. Because the verified declaration had already been accepted for fixation of annual capacity, a differential duty demand and consequential penalty based solely on the sale deed figure was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>