<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114202</link>
    <description>Valuation of acquired land for a housing scheme may require a substantial development deduction when compensation is based on sale deeds for very small plots. The Court held that such small-extents sales cannot be treated as the sole benchmark for a large, undeveloped tract, because the size disparity and the need for development justify reduction in the market value. Applying that principle, the High Court&#039;s 40% deduction was found consistent with settled compensation methodology and did not warrant interference. The compensation assessment was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114202</link>
      <description>Valuation of acquired land for a housing scheme may require a substantial development deduction when compensation is based on sale deeds for very small plots. The Court held that such small-extents sales cannot be treated as the sole benchmark for a large, undeveloped tract, because the size disparity and the need for development justify reduction in the market value. Applying that principle, the High Court&#039;s 40% deduction was found consistent with settled compensation methodology and did not warrant interference. The compensation assessment was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>