<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114196</link>
    <description>The appeals seeking revival under Section 32PA(7) of the Central Excise Act were allowed by the Tribunal for compliance ascertainment. The Tribunal emphasized that revival under Section 37PA(7) includes reinstatement at the same stage when the appeals were withdrawn. Compliance with provisional deposit orders was deemed crucial, and the appellants were directed to report compliance as per the pre-deposit orders existing when the appeals were withdrawn. Further orders would be issued based on compliance verification, concluding the disposal of the applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 11:25:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 683 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114196</link>
      <description>The appeals seeking revival under Section 32PA(7) of the Central Excise Act were allowed by the Tribunal for compliance ascertainment. The Tribunal emphasized that revival under Section 37PA(7) includes reinstatement at the same stage when the appeals were withdrawn. Compliance with provisional deposit orders was deemed crucial, and the appellants were directed to report compliance as per the pre-deposit orders existing when the appeals were withdrawn. Further orders would be issued based on compliance verification, concluding the disposal of the applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>