<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the penalties and redemption fine in an appeal against an order confirming goods confiscation and penalties under Rule 209A. It upheld the confiscation of finished goods but found the confiscation of unprocessed fabric unjustified. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 10,000, and penalties were adjusted accordingly. The penalty for appellant No. 1 was reduced to Rs. 15,000, while the penalty for appellant No. 2 was upheld at Rs. 10,000. The impugned order was modified based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 11:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the penalties and redemption fine in an appeal against an order confirming goods confiscation and penalties under Rule 209A. It upheld the confiscation of finished goods but found the confiscation of unprocessed fabric unjustified. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 10,000, and penalties were adjusted accordingly. The penalty for appellant No. 1 was reduced to Rs. 15,000, while the penalty for appellant No. 2 was upheld at Rs. 10,000. The impugned order was modified based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>