<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 458 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114191</link>
    <description>Flat-rolled mild steel products not exceeding 5 mm thickness qualified for deemed credit because the deemed credit notification treated plates as goods exceeding 5 mm, so the disputed goods fell outside that description. The traders&#039; invoices describing the goods as plates under Chapter Heading 73.08 were treated as a mistake, since the goods were admittedly flat-rolled products within the thinner category. Supporting invoices and challans from the manufacturer also omitted any chapter heading or sub-heading, making the incorrect trader description plausible. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to deemed credit on the goods in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 11:02:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 458 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114191</link>
      <description>Flat-rolled mild steel products not exceeding 5 mm thickness qualified for deemed credit because the deemed credit notification treated plates as goods exceeding 5 mm, so the disputed goods fell outside that description. The traders&#039; invoices describing the goods as plates under Chapter Heading 73.08 were treated as a mistake, since the goods were admittedly flat-rolled products within the thinner category. Supporting invoices and challans from the manufacturer also omitted any chapter heading or sub-heading, making the incorrect trader description plausible. On that basis, the appellants were entitled to deemed credit on the goods in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>