<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 630 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114184</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the eligibility of salts used in metal heat treatment as inputs under Rule 57A. It was determined that the salts were used for tempering metal, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:19:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 630 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114184</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the eligibility of salts used in metal heat treatment as inputs under Rule 57A. It was determined that the salts were used for tempering metal, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>