<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 790 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114177</link>
    <description>Clubbing of clearances for denial of small-scale industry exemption requires satisfaction of the statutory conditions for aggregation; common partners and inter-firm loan transactions, by themselves, do not establish that one unit is a dummy of another. Separate banking arrangements and independent commercial dealings pointed to distinct units, so clubbing was not justified and SSI benefit remained available. A deeming fiction in the job work notifications operates only for the limited purpose of fastening duty-related responsibility in the prescribed scheme; it cannot be extended to enlarge the supplier&#039;s turnover. On the stated facts, those notifications could not be used to add the job worker&#039;s clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:30:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 790 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114177</link>
      <description>Clubbing of clearances for denial of small-scale industry exemption requires satisfaction of the statutory conditions for aggregation; common partners and inter-firm loan transactions, by themselves, do not establish that one unit is a dummy of another. Separate banking arrangements and independent commercial dealings pointed to distinct units, so clubbing was not justified and SSI benefit remained available. A deeming fiction in the job work notifications operates only for the limited purpose of fastening duty-related responsibility in the prescribed scheme; it cannot be extended to enlarge the supplier&#039;s turnover. On the stated facts, those notifications could not be used to add the job worker&#039;s clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>