<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 910 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114172</link>
    <description>Where the same question arose across multiple matters arising from a composite adjudication, and one Revenue appeal on that issue had already been decided on merits and attained finality, the final determination bound the parties and barred further piecemeal appeals on the remaining matters. Additional appeals covering the same issue were therefore not maintainable. The remaining appeals were dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 910 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114172</link>
      <description>Where the same question arose across multiple matters arising from a composite adjudication, and one Revenue appeal on that issue had already been decided on merits and attained finality, the final determination bound the parties and barred further piecemeal appeals on the remaining matters. Additional appeals covering the same issue were therefore not maintainable. The remaining appeals were dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>