<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 918 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the classification of Maggi noodles under Tariff sub-heading 1902.90. The allegations of wilful mis-statement and suppression of facts were deemed unsustainable, with the Tribunal finding that the Revenue was aware of the situation. The Tribunal clarified the recovery of duty for the specified period and dismissed the argument regarding the provisional approval of the classification list.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 918 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellants in a dispute over the classification of Maggi noodles under Tariff sub-heading 1902.90. The allegations of wilful mis-statement and suppression of facts were deemed unsustainable, with the Tribunal finding that the Revenue was aware of the situation. The Tribunal clarified the recovery of duty for the specified period and dismissed the argument regarding the provisional approval of the classification list.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>