<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 455 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114162</link>
    <description>A duty demand under Section 11A could not be confirmed without issuance of a show cause notice, and the assessee&#039;s request to waive notice and personal hearing did not amount to a valid waiver of that statutory requirement. The prescribed procedure and principles of natural justice remained mandatory, and no estoppel could arise against compliance with the statute. Rule 233A was confined to oral notice in confiscation and penalty proceedings and did not dispense with notice for duty determination. The duty demand was therefore set aside and remitted for de novo adjudication after notice, while the confiscation component was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 455 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114162</link>
      <description>A duty demand under Section 11A could not be confirmed without issuance of a show cause notice, and the assessee&#039;s request to waive notice and personal hearing did not amount to a valid waiver of that statutory requirement. The prescribed procedure and principles of natural justice remained mandatory, and no estoppel could arise against compliance with the statute. Rule 233A was confined to oral notice in confiscation and penalty proceedings and did not dispense with notice for duty determination. The duty demand was therefore set aside and remitted for de novo adjudication after notice, while the confiscation component was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>