<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 377 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114154</link>
    <description>A starter supplied for operating a centrifugal fan was not includible in the fan&#039;s assessable value because the fan was complete without the starter. The fan and starter were treated as separately classifiable goods under different tariff entries, and the starter was not regarded as a part or integral component of the fan for valuation purposes. Its usefulness in operation did not convert it into a constituent of the fan. The valuation therefore excluded the starter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:14:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 377 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114154</link>
      <description>A starter supplied for operating a centrifugal fan was not includible in the fan&#039;s assessable value because the fan was complete without the starter. The fan and starter were treated as separately classifiable goods under different tariff entries, and the starter was not regarded as a part or integral component of the fan for valuation purposes. Its usefulness in operation did not convert it into a constituent of the fan. The valuation therefore excluded the starter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>