<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 471 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114140</link>
    <description>Applicants challenged a demand issued under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the ground that the rule had ceased to operate after 16-11-1980 and had not been revalidated. CESTAT found a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicants and, on that basis, waived pre-deposit of the adjudged duty and penalty. Recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 471 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114140</link>
      <description>Applicants challenged a demand issued under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the ground that the rule had ceased to operate after 16-11-1980 and had not been revalidated. CESTAT found a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicants and, on that basis, waived pre-deposit of the adjudged duty and penalty. Recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>