<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 465 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to deny the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on duty paid for free supply blades packed with razors, citing that the blades did not qualify as inputs in the manufacturing process. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the penalty imposed, stating that claiming CENVAT relief was not an offense, leading to the penalty being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:29:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 465 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to deny the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on duty paid for free supply blades packed with razors, citing that the blades did not qualify as inputs in the manufacturing process. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the penalty imposed, stating that claiming CENVAT relief was not an offense, leading to the penalty being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>