<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 456 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114125</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI addressed issues concerning compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act for pre-deposit in appeals, consideration of financial hardships pleas by appellate authorities, and the incorrect direction for pre-deposit of interest on duty under Section 35F. The Tribunal emphasized assessing financial hardships, set aside orders lacking such considerations, and directed authorities to reassess stay applications while ensuring adherence to natural justice and legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 456 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114125</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI addressed issues concerning compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act for pre-deposit in appeals, consideration of financial hardships pleas by appellate authorities, and the incorrect direction for pre-deposit of interest on duty under Section 35F. The Tribunal emphasized assessing financial hardships, set aside orders lacking such considerations, and directed authorities to reassess stay applications while ensuring adherence to natural justice and legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>