<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 448 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114117</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appellants&#039; appeal regarding the denial of Modvat credit due to the absence of the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry. The Tribunal distinguished the case from previous precedents cited by the Respondent, emphasizing that the appellants&#039; submission of a certified copy of the Bill of Entry sufficed, especially considering the department did not dispute the use of capital goods for manufacturing. Consequently, the appellants were deemed entitled to the Modvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:19:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 448 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114117</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appellants&#039; appeal regarding the denial of Modvat credit due to the absence of the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry. The Tribunal distinguished the case from previous precedents cited by the Respondent, emphasizing that the appellants&#039; submission of a certified copy of the Bill of Entry sufficed, especially considering the department did not dispute the use of capital goods for manufacturing. Consequently, the appellants were deemed entitled to the Modvat credit, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>