<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114113</link>
    <description>The court confirmed a duty demand against the appellants for violating an Ad-hoc Exemption Order, upheld the confiscation of imported line scan systems due to a contravention of the exemption condition, and set aside the penalty imposed under the Customs Act, deeming the contravention as technical and not warranting a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 444 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114113</link>
      <description>The court confirmed a duty demand against the appellants for violating an Ad-hoc Exemption Order, upheld the confiscation of imported line scan systems due to a contravention of the exemption condition, and set aside the penalty imposed under the Customs Act, deeming the contravention as technical and not warranting a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>