<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 442 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of plastic spring bangles as toy bangles for children&#039;s amusement under Chapter sub-heading 9503.00, following the analysis in a previous case. The revenue&#039;s classification as articles of plastic under a different heading was deemed incorrect, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit amounts and an early hearing scheduled. Recovery was prohibited until the appeal&#039;s resolution, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:04:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 442 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of plastic spring bangles as toy bangles for children&#039;s amusement under Chapter sub-heading 9503.00, following the analysis in a previous case. The revenue&#039;s classification as articles of plastic under a different heading was deemed incorrect, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit amounts and an early hearing scheduled. Recovery was prohibited until the appeal&#039;s resolution, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>