<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 528 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114103</link>
    <description>Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 applies when capital goods on which credit has been taken are removed as such from the factory, requiring duty payment on that removal. On a prima facie view, payment of duty on clearance of salvaged capital goods after a fire was treated as compliance with the rule. The appellant therefore established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 528 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114103</link>
      <description>Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 applies when capital goods on which credit has been taken are removed as such from the factory, requiring duty payment on that removal. On a prima facie view, payment of duty on clearance of salvaged capital goods after a fire was treated as compliance with the rule. The appellant therefore established a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>