https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114096 The Tribunal set aside duty demands, redemption fine, and penalty imposed in a case involving disallowance of Modvat credit and duty demand on goods removed without payment of duty. The Tribunal ruled that duty demand on jeeps cleared under Rule 57F(2) did not warrant penalty or confiscation due to disputed duty liability. Confiscation of jeeps fitted with bodies cleared without duty payment was also overturned as duty demands were not required on the supplier. The penalty and redemption fine were deemed disproportionate and unjustified given the disputed excise duty liability, leading to their dismissal. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 May 2012 11:45:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114096 The Tribunal set aside duty demands, redemption fine, and penalty imposed in a case involving disallowance of Modvat credit and duty demand on goods removed without payment of duty. The Tribunal ruled that duty demand on jeeps cleared under Rule 57F(2) did not warrant penalty or confiscation due to disputed duty liability. Confiscation of jeeps fitted with bodies cleared without duty payment was also overturned as duty demands were not required on the supplier. The penalty and redemption fine were deemed disproportionate and unjustified given the disputed excise duty liability, leading to their dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114096