<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 520 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the payment of duty by the appellant but remanded the issue of interest liability to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further examination. The case involved the interpretation of exemption conditions under Notification No. 34/98-Cus, liability for Special Additional Duty on imported goods, disposal of imported goods contrary to exemption conditions, and a request for remand for further scrutiny of documents related to the subsequent sale of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 520 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the payment of duty by the appellant but remanded the issue of interest liability to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further examination. The case involved the interpretation of exemption conditions under Notification No. 34/98-Cus, liability for Special Additional Duty on imported goods, disposal of imported goods contrary to exemption conditions, and a request for remand for further scrutiny of documents related to the subsequent sale of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>