<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 518 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was not entitled to a refund of duty paid on inputs due to the lapse of credit. The decision to remand for considering rebate on merits was upheld, while penalties and interest were deemed unjustified and modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 518 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was not entitled to a refund of duty paid on inputs due to the lapse of credit. The decision to remand for considering rebate on merits was upheld, while penalties and interest were deemed unjustified and modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>