<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 512 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114078</link>
    <description>The court held that there was no concluded agreement containing an arbitration clause. The correspondence and conduct of the parties did not establish a binding arbitration agreement as per Section 7(4)(b). The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision was correct in law, and no interim relief was granted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 512 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114078</link>
      <description>The court held that there was no concluded agreement containing an arbitration clause. The correspondence and conduct of the parties did not establish a binding arbitration agreement as per Section 7(4)(b). The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the learned Single Judge&#039;s decision was correct in law, and no interim relief was granted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>