<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to insufficient evidence of full input utilization but allowed the appeal on the valuation issue based on supporting invoices. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing a clear nexus between inputs and final products for Modvat credit eligibility and highlighted the importance of documentary evidence in disputes over goods valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 512 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand due to insufficient evidence of full input utilization but allowed the appeal on the valuation issue based on supporting invoices. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing a clear nexus between inputs and final products for Modvat credit eligibility and highlighted the importance of documentary evidence in disputes over goods valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>